Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Garcia et al. v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners et al.
421 U.S. 995·United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania·1975
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 2, 1975
No. 74-1027.
Garcia et al. v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners et al.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in thé consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
No. 73-1285, Wood v. Strickland, infra, p. 997; No. 74-1027, Garcia v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, infra, this page; No. 74-1057, Commodity Option Co. v. Bernhardt, infra, p. 1004; No. 74-1062, Caldwell v. City of New Orleans, infra, p. 1003; No. 74-1072, Henderson v. Donivan, infra, p. 996; No. 74-1076, Washington v. Murray, infra, p. 1004; No. 74-1085, Matteo v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1097, Consumers Union of United States v. Kissinger, infra, p. 1004; No. 74-1121, Hood v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1133, Strauss v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1143, Indiviglio v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1160, George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc., infra, p. 1004; No. 74-1218, Allen Homes, Inc. v. Weersing, infra, p. 998; No. 74—1244, Brundage v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-1270, Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc., infra, p. 998; No. 74-1271, H & R Block, Inc. v. Havenfield Corp., infra, p. 999; No. 74-1272, Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Higginbotham, infra, p. 999; No. 74-1278, Lovelace v. DeChamplain, infra, p. 996; No. 74-1287, Weinstein v. Bradford, infra, p. 998; No. 74—1308, Lundvall v. Kuiper, infra, p. 996; No. 74-6072, Jackson v. Illinois, infra, p. 999; No. 74-6108, Moore v. United States, infra, p. 999; No. 74-6121, Saunders v. Foltz, infra, p. 999; No. 74-6161, Breen v. United States, infra, p. 998; No. 74-6238, Geelan v. United States, infra, p. 999; and No. 74-6357, Roots v. Wainwright, infra, p. 996.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. W. D. Tex.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.