Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Mortimer Falk et al., Respondents, v. The American West Indies Trading Company, Appellant
171 N.Y. 679·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mortimer Falk et al., Respondents, v. The American West Indies Trading Company, Appellant.
Falk v. American West Indies Trading Go., 71 App. Div. 320, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted June 9, 1902;
decided June 17, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered May 6, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term,
The motion was made upon the grounds that the record presents no question for review by the Court of Appeals and that the judgment and order are not appealable.
Morris S. Wise for motion.
Isaac M. Aron opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.