General
WRIGHT et al. v. BLACK
176 F. 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1910
Before PRIT-CHARD, Circuit Judge, and BRAWLEY and CONNOR, District Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WRIGHT et al. v. BLACK.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
February 21, 1910.)
No. 909.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
J. P. Hund-ían and Henry M. Russell, for plaintiffs in error.
William Erksltine, Benjamin g. Allison, and Edward Kibler, for defendant in error.
Before PRIT-CHARD, Circuit Judge, and BRAWLEY and CONNOR, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This was an action in assumpsit to recover compensation for personal services. It involved questions of fact that seem to us to have been fairly submitted to the jury, and a careful examination of the record and of the printed arguments submitted fails to satisfy us that any reversible errors were committed on the trial. The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.