Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
CARP et al. v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY et al.
389 U.S. 52·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CARP et al. v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY et al.
No. 481.
Decided October 23, 1967.
Thurman Arnold, Robert E. Herzstein, Douglas E. Bergman, Quentin Keith and Price Daniel for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, J. C. Davis and John Reeves, Assistant Attorneys General, Will Garwood and Tom Gee, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellee Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry, and Ellis Lyons, Bennett Boskey, Charles M-. Babb and Mark Martin for other appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.