General

JOHN LOMAX, Respondent, v. EZEKIEL COOPER et al., Appellants

1 Cal. Unrep. 147·Supreme Court of California·1864·CA

We concur: Currey, J.; Sawyer, J.; Shafter, J.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

JOHN LOMAX, Respondent, v. EZEKIEL COOPER et al., Appellants. No. 225; July 11, 1864. Appeal.- — The Findings of a Eeferee are not to he Disturbed if there was sufficient evidence in the case to sustain them. APPEAL from Twelfth Judicial District, San Francisco County. W. P. C. Whitney for respondent; J. B. Crockett for appellants. [MAJORITY — SANDERSON, C. J.] SANDERSON, C. J. This action was brought to enjoin the defendants from removing a building from a lot in the city of San Francisco alleged to belong to the plaintiff. The case was tried by a referee who found the facts and reported a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal. The only point made by counsel for appellants is that the finding of the referee is contrary to the evidence. We have carefully read all the evidence contained in the record and are satisfied that it fully sustains the finding. Judgment affirmed. We concur: Currey, J.; Sawyer, J.; Shafter, J.