General

Henderson v. United States; Wildman v. United States; Shufflebarger v. United States; and Frantz v. United States

339 U.S. 963·Supreme Court of the United States·1950

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

No. 716. No. 717. No. 718. No. 719. Henderson v. United States; Wildman v. United States; Shufflebarger v. United States; and Frantz v. United States. C. A. 7th Cir. John W. MacDonald for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Philip R. Monahan and Felicia H. Dubrovsky for the United States. [MAJORITY] Certiorari denied.

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.