RHP Bearings Ltd., et al., plaintiffs v. United States, defendant, and Torrington Co., defendant-intervenor

966 F. Supp. 1240 RHP Bearings Ltd., et al., plaintiffs v. United States, defendant, and Torrington Co., defendant-intervenor Court No. 97-02-00217 (Dated May 27, 1997) [MAJORITY — Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:] ORDER Tsoucalas, Senior Judge: Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motion for expedited remand to correct clerical errors and defendant’s cross-motion for leave to correct an additional clerical error, it is hereby Ordered that the plaintiffs’ motion and defendant’s cross-motion are granted; and it is further Ordered that this case is remanded to the U.S. Department of Commerce to A. Correct its computer program with respect to the final results for NSK-RHP in Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the United Kingdom; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, 62 Fed Reg. 2081 (Jan. 15, 1997), as follows: 1. Calculate credit for constructed value separately by class of merchandise; 2. Calculate constructed value credit by convertingthe pound sterling values to U.S. dollars once only; 3. Sample cylindrical roller bearings sales correctly; 4. Include credit insurance in calculating DSELCOP; 5. Weigh the values for total home market selling expenses (TOT-SELLH) and total home market movement expenses (TOTMOVEH) by a factor of two to establish uniform weighting of home market expenses; 6. Apply the default credit period for those U.S. sales missing payments dates to net selling price (defined as the original selling price less billing adjustments and rebates); and 7. Multiply the entered value for sampled U.S. sales by the weighting factor only once when calculating importer-specific duty rates; B. Recalculate NSK-RHP’s margins following the correction of the above clerical errors; and C. File the remand results within 30 days of the date this order is entered.