Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
George H. Preston et al., Appellants, v. John C. Howk, as Executor of Julia A. Freer, Deceased, et al., Respondents
154 N.Y. 734·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George H. Preston et al., Appellants, v. John C. Howk, as Executor of Julia A. Freer, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Preston v. Howk, 3 App. Div. 43, affirmed.
(Submitted June 23, 1897;
decided October 19, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 3, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term, and also affirmed an order of Special Term granting an additional allowance of costs.
W. Martin Jones for appellants.
TI. R. Durfee for respondent Howk.
S. B. M’Intyre for trustees of Presbyterian church, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent, Haight, J., dissenting, .and Vann, J., not voting.