Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
The General Contracting Company, Appellant, v. Claude C. Jones et al., Respondents
181 N.Y. 564·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The General Contracting Company, Appellant, v. Claude C. Jones et al., Respondents.
General Contracting Co. v. Jones, 89 App. Div. 616, affirmed.
(Argued April 19, 1905;
decided May 5, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 15, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Adobph Pebadow for appellant.
Edward E. Goatsworth and Frederick Wende for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs;' no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Bartlett, J.