General
Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 494·United States Customs Court·1966
Before Richardson and Landis, Judges
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(C.D. 2849)
Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Third Division
(Decided December 12,1966)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
Barefoot Sanders, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Richardson and Landis, Judges
[MAJORITY — Landis, Judge:]
Landis, Judge:
When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and defendant moved to dismiss the protest for lack of prosecution.
It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it is dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.