Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
CITY OF NASHVILLE et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
355 U.S. 63·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CITY OF NASHVILLE et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 365.
Decided November 18, 1957
Allison B. Humphreys, Harold Seligman and William Waller for appellants in No. 365.
Judson Harwood for appellants in No. 519.
Solicitor General Rankin and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
W. L. Grubbs, John J. Hooker and William H. Swiggart for the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., appellee.
Together with No. 519, Lambert et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.