General
Hiram T. Chapman, Plaintiff in Error, v. Florence Elliott Chapman
203 U.S. 586·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 239.
Hiram T. Chapman, Plaintiff in Error, v. Florence Elliott Chapman.
Motion to dismiss submitted December 10, 1906.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska.
Decided December 17, 1906.
Mr. William E. Gantt and Mr. Herbert L. Baker for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. F. Colladay, Mr. J. W. Woodrough and Mr. W. F. Gurley for defendant in error.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173.