Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Application of The Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York for the Acquisition of Land for Edgecombe Road; Edward F. O'Dwyer et al., as Commissioners, Appellants; The City of New York, Respondent
158 N.Y. 670·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York for the Acquisition of Land for Edgecombe Road. Edward F. O’Dwyer et al., as Commissioners, Appellants; The City of New York, Respondent.
(Argued January 10, 1899;
decided January 24, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 13, 1898, reversing an order of Special Term granting appellants an extra allowance and compensation.
Matter of Board of Street Opening, 33 App. Div. 137, appeal dismissed.
Edward F. O’Dwyer for appellants.
Theodore Connoly and John P. Dunn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, on the ground that the order is not a final order in a special proceeding, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.