Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Alexander Frankenstein et al., Appellants, v. Barnett Hamburger et al., Defendants, and Isaac M. Berinstein, Respondent
172 N.Y. 609·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alexander Frankenstein et al., Appellants, v. Barnett Hamburger et al., Defendants, and Isaac M. Berinstein, Respondent.
Frankenstein v. Hamburger, 73 App. Div. 352, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 7, 1902;
decided October 21, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 26, 1902, which aifirmed an order of Special Term settling the accounts of a receiver of rents and profits in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage.
Leona/rcL Bronner and A. B. Ba/rMmrst for .appellants.
Max L. Schallelc for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the order appealed from ivas made in an action and not in a special proceeding ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.