General
Eunice Niemoller, Respondent, v. Naomi Duncombe, Appellant
172 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eunice Niemoller, Respondent, v. Naomi Duncombe, Appellant.
Niemoller v. Duncombe, 59 App. Div. 614, affirmed.
(Argued October 10, 1902;
decided October 28, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered' March 19, 1901, upon an order reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint and directing judgment for plaintiff upon a verdict which had been set aside by the trial court.
Roger M. Sherman for appellant.
William L. Snyder for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.