Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
IP
Clara E. Fromer, Respondent, v. Simon Ottenberg et al., Appellants
186 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clara E. Fromer, Respondent, v. Simon Ottenberg et al., Appellants.
Fromer v. Ottenberg, 105 App. Div. 640, affirmed.
(Argued October 15, 1906;
decided November 13, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment- of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 21, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a refereé in an action to restrain the alleged infringement of a certain trade mark or brand for cigars.
John J. Crawford and Charles H. Brush for appellants.
S. K. Lichenstein for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cüllen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.