Bankruptcy
Connie J. SPENCE, Appellant, v. JOSEPH S. KNECHT AND COMPANY, Appellee, and United States Trustee, Trustee
194 F. App’x 102·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·2006
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Connie J. SPENCE, Appellant, v. JOSEPH S. KNECHT AND COMPANY, Appellee, and United States Trustee, Trustee.
No. 05-2083.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 12, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 15, 2006.
Edward E. Gilbert, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellant. Robert A. Kerr, Jr., Brendan P. Langendorfer, Ha-good & Kerr, PA, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Connie J. Spence appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order allowing Joseph S. Knecht and Company’s claim for costs and attorney’s fees incurred in the collection of its debt. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spence v. Joseph S. Knecht & Co., No. CA-05-103-18 (D.S.C. Sept. 7, 2005). We have previously granted Appel-lee’s unopposed motion to submit this case on the briefs and therefore dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.