Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Julian Robert PROCTOR v. STATE of Arkansas
342 Ark. 825 S.W.3d 413·Arkansas Supreme Court·2000·AR
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julian Robert PROCTOR v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 00-779
25 S.W.3d 413
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered September 7, 2000
William C. McArthur, for appellant.
No response.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Julian Robert Proctor, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, William C. McArthur, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.