Contracts · MBE-tested
Nasuf Construction Corporation, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant
185 A.D.2d 304·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1992·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nasuf Construction Corporation, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.
(Claim No. 79366.)
[MAJORITY]
In a claim to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (Benza, J.), dated August 2, 1990, as denied its cross motion for leave to file an amended answer with a counterclaim for $490,440.58.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The order appealed from was superseded by an order of the same court, dated November 20, 1990, made upon reargument (see, Nasuf Constr. Corp. v State of New York, 185 AD2d 305 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.