Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
LeRoy G. SCOTT, Appellant, v. Frank GRETEN
61 F.2d 1039·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LeRoy G. SCOTT, Appellant, v. Frank GRETEN.
No. 9466.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
July 28, 1932.
George J. Danforth and Holton Davenport, both of Sioux Falls, S. D., for appellant.
G. C. Putnam, Max Putnam, and L. S. Forrest, all of Des Moines, Iowa, and Charles F. Stilwell, of Sioux City, Iowa, for appel-lee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of parties.