Corporations

SCHILLING v. CAR LIGHTING & POWER CO. et al.

289 F. 493·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1923

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

SCHILLING v. CAR LIGHTING & POWER CO. et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. March 22, 1923.) No. 246. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit in equity by Fred F. Schilling against the Car Lighting & Power Company and others. From an order continuing in force a temporary restraining order until the defendant corporation should hold another stockholders’ meeting (289 Fed. 489), plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed. Chadbourne, Hunt & Jaeekel, of New York City (Frank Marsh, of New York City, and Carroll R. Ward, of Springfield, Mass., of counsel), for appellant. Hays, Hershfield & Wolf, of New York City (Daniel P. Hays and Edwin D. Hays, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees. Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAYER, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed in open court, without costs.