Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Darrow, Appellant
171 N.Y. 697·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Darrow, Appellant.
People v. Barrow. 69 App. Div. 615, affirmed.
(Submitted June 19, 1902;
decided June 27, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 7, 1902, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the county of New York convicting’ the defendant of the crime of attempted grand larceny in the first degree.
Maurice Meyer for appellant.
William Travers Jerome, District Attorney (Robert C. Taylor of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ.