Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawrence v. Texas, 1967 — 389 U.S. 920 · caselaw · US
General · Landmark
Lawrence v. Texas
389 U.S. 920·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 198,
Misc.
Lawrence v. Texas.
Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., for petitioner.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, R. L. Lattimore, Howard M. Fender and Lonny F. Zwiener, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.