Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Florida-Georgia Television Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission; and Jacksonville Broadcasting Corp. v. Florida-Georgia Television Co., Inc.
382 U.S. 893·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 590.
No. 678.
Florida-Georgia Television Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission; and Jacksonville Broadcasting Corp. v. Florida-Georgia Television Co., Inc.
Warner W. Gardner, Lawrence J. Latto, William H. Dempsey, Jr., Bernard Roteen, Alan Y. Naftalin and Richard F. Wolf son for petitioner in No. 590.
Charles H. Murchison for petitioner in No. 678.
William H. Dempsey, Jr., for respondent in No. 678.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Jacksonville Broadcasting Corp. to be added as a party respondent in No. 590 denied. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 121 U. S. App. D. C. 69, 348 F. 2d 75.