Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Torts · MBE-tested
McCarthy et al., Trustees of the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co., et al. v. Bruner
323 U.S. 673·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 41.
McCarthy et al., Trustees of the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co., et al. v. Bruner.
Argued October 19, 1944.
Decided November 13, 1944.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
In this case, certiorari was granted upon a petition which urged that the UtahSupreme Court erred in affirming a judgment for the respondent upon the ground that a verdict could have been directed for respondent upon the issues of negligence and contributory negligence. On oral argument and submission, it appears that these contentions are not decisive of the case, since the issues of negligence and contributory negligence were in fact submitted to the jury, and since petitioners’ contentions, made after the granting of certiorari, that the trial court erred in instructing or failing to instruct the jury on these issues, are either insubstantial or not properly raised on the record. The writ of certiorari is therefore dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. W. Q. Van Cott, with whom Mr. P. T. Farnsworth, Jr. was on the brief, for petitioners.
Mr. Parnell Black, with whom Messrs. Calvin W. Rawlings and Harold E. Wallace were on the brief, for respondent.