General
UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellant, v. J. Henry NEAL et al., Trustees, Plaintiffs, Appellees
28 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellant, v. J. Henry NEAL et al., Trustees, Plaintiffs, Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit
October 30, 1928.
No. 2287.
For opinion below, see 26 F.(2d) 708.
J. Duke Smith, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of Boston, Mass. (Frederick H. Tarr, U. S. Atty., C. M. Charest, and L. H. Baylies, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.
William Harold Hitchcock, of Boston, Mass., for appellee.
Before BINGHAM, JOHNSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This ease is governed by our decision of August 27, 1928, in Thomas W. White, Collector, v. Henry Hornblower et al., Trustees, 27 F.(2d) 777.
The judgment of the District Court is vacated, and the ease is remanded to that court, with directions to enter judgment for the appellant.