Corporations
Hartman, Sheridan & Tekulsky, Respondents, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant; Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant; Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant; Bergdorf & Goodman Company, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth Hale, Respondent; Bonwit Teller, Inc., Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth Hale, Respondent; Federated Department Stores, Inc., Respondent, v. Elisabeth Hale, Respondent, and Bernard R. Hale, Appellant; Lord & Taylor, a Division of Associated Dry Goods Corporation, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent
285 A.D. 949·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1955·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hartman, Sheridan & Tekulsky, Respondents, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant. Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant. Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant. Bergdorf & Goodman Company, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth Hale, Respondent. Bonwit Teller, Inc., Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth Hale, Respondent. Federated Department Stores, Inc., Respondent, v. Elisabeth Hale, Respondent, and Bernard R. Hale, Appellant. Lord & Taylor, a Division of Associated Dry Goods Corporation, Respondent, v. Bernard R. Hale, Appellant, and Elisabeth B. Hale, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to consolidate the seven actions granted. There are issues common to all actions to be tried. There is also an especially valuable policy to be served by consolidation in this type of situation (see Benjamin v. Benjamin, 283 App. Div. 455). Settle order on notice. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.