Paul Adler and Others, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Adler, Coleman & Co., George Sirota and Another, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Sirota, Rosen & Co., Respondents, v. Bush Terminal Company, James C. Van Siclen and C. Walter Randall, as Receivers in Equity of the Bush Terminal Company, a Debtor, under Petition for Reorganization by Reason of Section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, Appellants

Paul Adler and Others, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Adler, Coleman & Co., George Sirota and Another, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Sirota, Rosen & Co., Respondents, v. Bush Terminal Company, James C. Van Siclen and C. Walter Randall, as Receivers in Equity of the Bush Terminal Company, a Debtor, under Petition for Reorganization by Reason of Section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, Appellants. [MAJORITY] Order striking from the answer the first, second, third, fourth and fifth defenses on the ground that they are sham, and the counterclaim on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and order denying defendants’ motion to incorporate in the record on appeal the entire examination of plaintiffs before trial, affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.