Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Henry A. WALLACE, Sec. of Agriculture, etc., v. EDGEWATER DAIRY COMPANY et al.
75 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry A. WALLACE, Sec. of Agriculture, etc., v. EDGEWATER DAIRY COMPANY et al.
No. 5277.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 13, 1935.
Harold M. Stephens, of Washington, D. C., Dwight H. Green, of Chicago, 111., Carl McFarland, A. H. Feller, Jerome N. Frank, and Arthur C. Bachrach, all of Washington, D. C., Lee Pressman, of New York City, and John J. Abt, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.-
Arthur R. Seelig, Leo D. Schein, and Joseph C. Kanak, all of Chicago, 111., for appellees.
Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZ-HENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
•Now this day come the parties by their counsel, and counsel for appellants present a motion that this appeal be dismissed for the reason that the Chicago Milk License in the Chicago area was terminated on, to wit, March 2, 1935, by the Secretary of Agriculture, thereby rendering moot the matters and issues involved in said appeal.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and’the same is hereby, dismissed.