Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Frank W. Goreth, as Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Keiher, Deceased, Respondent, v. Jacob R. Shipherd, Appellant
186 N.Y. 553·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank W. Goreth, as Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Keiher, Deceased, Respondent, v. Jacob R. Shipherd, Appellant.
Goreth v. Shipherd, 92 App. Div. 611, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted October 15, 1906;
decided October 23, 1906.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 4, 1904, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for the vacation of certain orders of discontinuance.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was unauthorized, permission to appeal not having been obtained.
Charles H. Strong for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs.