General

Bridget Lannon, Appellant, v. Christian Evers and George Putscher, Respondents

146 A.D. 931·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Bridget Lannon, Appellant, v. Christian Evers and George Putscher, Respondents. Appeal from a judgment entered on the 17th day of April, 1911, on a verdict for $500 and from an order entered on the 15th day of April, 1911, denying a motion for a new trial. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam:] Per Curiam: We think that the verdict in this case was totally inadequate as compensation for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, and the judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed, and the motion to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial upon the ground of the inadequacy of the verdict is granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Miller and Dow-ling, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.