Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Washington Public Power Supply System v. Federal Power Commission et al.
385 U.S. 926·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 462.
Washington Public Power Supply System v. Federal Power Commission et al.
Northcutt Ely for petitioner.
Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahren-brock, Peter H. Schiff and Joel Yohalem for Federal Power Commission; Francis M. Shea, William H. Dempsey, Jr., and Ralph J. Moore, Jr., for Pacific Northwest Power Co.; and Robert Y. Thomton>, Attorney General, and Richard W. Sabin and Leon L. Hagan, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Oregon, respondents.
Allan G. Shepard, Attorney General of Idaho, and T. J. Jones III for Idaho Fish and Game Commission; and Joseph T. Mijich for Washington State Sportsmen’s Council, Inc., et al., intervenors below, in opposition to the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motions of Pacific Northwest Power Co. and the State of Oregon to be added as parties respondent granted. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument immediately following No. 463.