Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
John McMANUS and Joe Bethey v. UNITED STATES
11 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John McMANUS and Joe Bethey v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
December 8, 1925.)
No. 4433.
In Error to tke District Court of tke United States for tke Western District of Michigan; Clarence W. Sessions, Judge.
John J. Smolenski, of Grand Rapids, Mick., for plaintiff in error.
Edward J. Bowman, U. S. Atty., of Grand Rapids, Mick.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed, in pursuance of motion of counsel for defendant in error.