Contracts · MBE-tested
SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA FRUIT LAND COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. E. F. MAY, Appellant
32 Cal. App. 804·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1916·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 1578.
Third Appellate District.
December 15, 1916.]
SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA FRUIT LAND COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. E. F. MAY, Appellant.
Quieting Title — Specific Performance.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of Superior California Fruit Land Company v. Grossman, ante, p. 357.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. H. M. Albery, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Superior California Fruit Land Company v. Grossman, ante, p. 357.
R. H. Countryman, for Appellant.
De Ligne & Jones, and H. T. Hiatt, for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — PLUMMER, J., pro tem.]
PLUMMER, J., pro tem.
This action, No. 1578, is a companion cause of action to No. 1577, Superior California Fruit Land Company v. Grossman, ante, p. 357, this day decided, and for the reasons therein given the judgment in this action is hereby affirmed.
Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 12, 1917.