Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Levitt, Comptroller of New York, et al. v. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty et al.; and La Salle Academy et al. v. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty et al.
433 U.S. 902·Supreme Court of the United States·1977
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Stevens would affirm the judgment.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 76-595.
No. 76-713.
Levitt, Comptroller of New York, et al. v. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty et al.; and La Salle Academy et al. v. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. S. D. N. Y. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Wolman v. Walter, ante, p. 229.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Stevens would affirm the judgment.
Reported below: 414 F. Supp. 1174.