General
Clara Isabelle Curtis et al., Appellants, v. Ann Murphy et al., Respondents
129 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clara Isabelle Curtis et al., Appellants, v. Ann Murphy et al., Respondents.
(Argued December 3, 1891;
decided December 22, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, entered upon an order made June 3, 1890, which overruled plaintiffs’ exceptions, directed by the court in favor of defendants, denied a motion for a new trial and directed judgment in favor of defendants upon said verdict.
John Townshend for appellants.
John F. Dillon for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on authority of Townshend v. Frommer (125 N. Y. 446).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.