General
The California Development Company, Petitioner, v. The New Liverpool Salt Company
215 U.S. 603·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 656.
The California Development Company, Petitioner, v. The New Liverpool Salt Company.
November 15, 1909.
Mr. Maxwell Evarts and Mr. Eugene S. Ives for petitioner. Mr. Charles Page, Mr. Edward. J. McCutchen and Mr. Samuel Knight for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.