General
BATTISTA et al., trading as NOR-VIEW FARM v. MILK CONTROL COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA
379 U.S. 3·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BATTISTA et al., trading as NOR-VIEW FARM v. MILK CONTROL COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 295.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Frederick A. Ballard for appellants.
■ Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Anthony W. Novasitis, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Cüriam.]
Per Cüriam.
The motion to dismiss is granted arid the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.