Contracts · MBE-tested
Robert L. KRUSE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert E. HAMPTON et al., Defendants-Appellees
513 F.2d 1231·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert L. KRUSE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert E. HAMPTON et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74-2769.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 30, 1975.
William H. McDermott, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Charles S. White-Spunner, U. S. Atty., Irwin W. Coleman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., Morton Hollander, Eloise E. Davies, Stephen F. Eilperin, Washington, D. C., Dept, of Justice, for defendants-appellees.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, and the contentions of the parties at oral argument, we have determined that appellants have failed to demonstrate error. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court opinion. 394 F.Supp. 764 (S.D.Ala. 1975).
Affirmed.