Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Robert MILLER v. STATE of Arkansas

326 Ark. 1101934 S.W.2d 532·Arkansas Supreme Court·1996·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Robert MILLER v. STATE of Arkansas CR 96-1448 934 S.W.2d 532 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered December 23, 1996 Darrel Blount, for appellant. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Robert Miller, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Darrel Blount, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.