Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Allen Gene KILEN [Kilan], Appellant
518 F.2d 1297·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1975
Before GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Allen Gene KILEN [Kilan], Appellant.
No. 73-1661.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 1975.
Michael L. Krassner, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
The Honorable William M. Byrne, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation at the argument of this case, died before this case was decided.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
Before GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.
On July 8, 1975, appellee filed its petition for rehearing. The panel then called for appellant’s response. On August 6, 1975, appellant filed a response, to the effect that given the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Peltier, - U.S. -, 95 S.Ct. 2313, 45 L.Ed.2d 374 (1975), he has no objection to the granting of the appellee’s petition for rehearing.
The court having considered the petition for rehearing and the response, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is granted, and, upon the authority of United States v. Peltier, the Memorandum filed May 27, 1974, in the above-entitled case is withdrawn and the judgment is affirmed.