Corporations
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug VOLUNTEER, Scow G. G. No. 146-W, and Scow G. G. No. 78, Their Engines, Tackle, etc.; Goodwin Gallagher Sand & Gravel Corporation, Claimant-Appellant. Goodwin Sand & Gravel Corporation, Libelant-Appellant, v. Steam Tug TRANSFER NO. 6, Her Engines, etc.; New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Claimant-Appellee
23 F.2d 1006·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tug VOLUNTEER, Scow G. G. No. 146-W, and Scow G. G. No. 78, Their Engines, Tackle, etc.; Goodwin Gallagher Sand & Gravel Corporation, Claimant-Appellant. Goodwin Sand & Gravel Corporation, Libelant-Appellant, v. Steam Tug TRANSFER NO. 6, Her Engines, etc.; New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Claimant-Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 9, 1928.
No. 77.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Maeklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Barry, Wainwright, Thacher & Symmers, of New York City (Earle Farwell, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed, with costs.