Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
NORTH PACIFIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. BOLGER et al.
23 F.2d 110·United States District Court for the District of California·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NORTH PACIFIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. BOLGER et al.
District Court, D. California.
December 14, 1918.
No. 424.
Aitken, Glensor & Clewe, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.
Benjamin L. McKinley, Acting U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.
[MAJORITY — BOURQUIN, District Judge.]
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
The suit is like No. 386 (D. C.) 23 F.(2d) 109, and, for reasons therein, the motion to dismiss is denied.