Property · MBE-tested

Alice M. Kelly, Respondent, v. Paul Wasserman, Appellant

12 A.D.2d 645·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1960·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Alice M. Kelly, Respondent, v. Paul Wasserman, Appellant. [MAJORITY] In an action to reform a deed to certain real property and in a summary proceeding by defendant against plaintiff to dispossess her from said property, the proceeding having been consolidated with the action and tried together, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 13, 1959, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the petition in the summary proceeding and directing that the deed be reformed to show that the property is subject to a life tenancy in favor of the plaintiff as long as her “ occupancy under said tenancy shall remain legal”. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.