Criminal Law · MBE-tested

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. HARRY WARNER, Appellant

94 Cal. App. 798·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1928·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Crim. No. 1693. Second Appellate District, Division One. September 19, 1928.] THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. HARRY WARNER, Appellant. Roscoe O. Stotter for Appellant. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, John L. Flynn, Deputy Attorney-General, and John D. Richer for Respondent. [MAJORITY — THE COURT.] THE COURT. This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction on a charge of burglary. The sole ground of appeal relied upon by appellant is identical with the contention of appellant in People v. Giron (Crim. No. 1699), ante, p. 53 [270 Pac. 462]. On the authority of that decision, and for the reasons therein appearing, the judgment in this case is affirmed. A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on October 15, 1928.