Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology et al. v. C. K. Williams & Co., Inc., et al.; and C. K. Williams & Co., Inc., v. Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology et al.
365 U.S. 811·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 553.
No. 606.
Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology et al. v. C. K. Williams & Co., Inc., et al.; and C. K. Williams & Co., Inc., v. Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology et al.
Carlton Hill and Benjamin H. Sherman for petitioners in No. 553 and, together with Edward A. Haight and William H. Abbott, for respondents in No. 606.
Albert C. Johnston, Marcus A. Hollabaugh and Henry Driemeyer for C. K. Williams .& Co., Inc., in Nos. 553 and 606.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 280 F. 2d 499.