General
Hortense Tracy, Appellant, v. Lydia B. Froment, Respondent
172 A.D. 947·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1916·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hortense Tracy, Appellant, v. Lydia B. Froment, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 20th day of January, 1916, granting a motion to require the plaintiff to make the complaint more definite and certain.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
We are of the opinion that the complaint sets forth a cause of action with sufficient definiteness and certainty. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and -the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.