Corporations
United States v. Container Corporation of America et al.
390 U.S. 1022·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1064.
United States v. Container Corporation of America et al.
Solicitor General Griswold,. Assistant Attorney General Turner, Lawrence G. Wallace, Robert A. Hammond III and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States. Whitney North Seymour and William J. Manning for respondent Container Corporation of America; Joseph C. Carter, Jr., for respondent Albermarle Paper Mfg. Co. et al.; W. P. Sandridge and W. F. Womble for respondent Carolina Container Co.; Helmer R. Johnson for respondent Continental Can Company, Inc.; Howard T. Milman for respondent Crown Zellerbach Corp.; David J. Mays for respondent Dixie Container Corp. et al.; Alan W. Boyd for respondent Inland Container Corp.; Lawrence E. Walsh and Henry L. King for respondent International Paper Co.; Fred E. Fuller for respondent Owens-Illinois Glass Co.; Richard A. Whiting for respondent St. Joe Paper Co.; Horace R. Lamb for respondent St. Regis Paper Co.; James H. Epps, Jr., for respondent Tri-State Container Corp.; James R. Whithrow, Jr., for respondent Union Bag-Camp Paper Co.; and E. Nobles Lowe for respondent West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. M. D. N. C. Probable jurisdiction noted.