Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
G. F. GROHE-HENRICH & CO., Plaintiff Appellant, v. GUARANTY TRUST CO. and Brown Brothers & Co., Defendants Appellees
5 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
G. F. GROHE-HENRICH & CO., Plaintiff Appellant, v. GUARANTY TRUST CO. and Brown Brothers & Co., Defendants Appellees.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 2, 1925.)
No. 258.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Kellogg, Emery, Inness-Brown & Cuthell, of New York City (Dean Emery and Henry G. Hotchkiss, both of New York City,” of counsel), for appellant.
Appleton, Butler & Rice, of New York City (Lee J. Perrin and Edwin T. Rice, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed, with costs.