General
George D. Lancaster et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. James W. Thacker et al.
239 U.S. 625·Supreme Court of the United States·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OPINIONS PER CURIAM, ETC., FROM OCTOBER 11, 1915, TO JANUARY 17, 1916.
No. 530.
George D. Lancaster et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. James W. Thacker et al.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.
Motion to dismiss or affirm or place on summary docket submitted October 12, 1915.
Decided October 25, 1915.
Mr. Bynum E. Hinton and Mr. J. H. Hazelrigg for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. T. L. Edelen for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Railway Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623; Rippey v. Texas, 193 U. S. 504; Eberle v. Michigan, 232 U. S. 700.